Due to corruption, Asia is in for a big swine flu year

Written by Damjan Denoble. Filed under Asia, NOT-China, China, Public Health. Bookmark the Permalink. Post a Comment. Leave a Trackback URL.

Posted By Damjan DeNoble

I was fooling around with some numbers today and ran smack into a terrifically important statistical curiosity.

There is a strong correlation between a country’s ranking in the transparency index, which measures perceived levels of corruption within the country, and the number of swine flu cases that it has reported.  The big implication of this finding is that if you get sick this year in Asia, you will likely get sick from the swine flu – the mainland has low swine flu numbers, and is ripe with corruption.

Using figures from Nationmaster (a tremendously powerful online statistical tool) I found that in a sample of country’s from the Pacific rim, reported cases of H1N1 as a percentage of their populations (data current as of July 18, 2009) correlate almost exactly with the corruption ranking of each country relative to its neighbors.

The only exception is Thailand, but one obvious explanation is that the country boasts one of the world’s premiere private health systems.  I would not be surprised if reporting from Bangkok hospital giants like Bumrungrad, accounted for most of the country’s reported total of swine flu cases.

COUNTRY Reported Cases H1N1 Corruption Ranking Population Rep. Cases as % of Pop.
Australia

12146

3

21,007,310

0.058

New Zealand

2405

1

4,173,460

0.058

Singapore

1109

2

4,608,167

0.024

Hong Kong

1639

4

7,018,636

0.023

Thailand

5409

8

65,493,296

0.008

Japan

2975

5

127,288,416

0.002

Malaysia

446

6

25,274,132

0.002

South Korea

463

7

48,379,392

0.001

Vietnam

310

11

86,116,560

4E-04

Laos

5

9

6,677,534

7E-05

China

806

10

1,330,044,544

6E-05

Cambodia

4

13

14,241,640

3E-05

Russia

4

12

140,702,096

3E-06

Burma

1

14

47,758,180

2E-06

United States

42,000

NA

300,000,000

0.014

China (hypotethical)

190,000

NA

1,330,044,544

0.014

My suspicion as to the accuracy of reports coming from countries like China, Vietnam, and Russia was aroused after I saw the map below over at the flu tracker website.

Three things to notice:

1.) Countries like China, India, and Russia are surrounded by the flu on all sides, yet somehow they miraculously appear unscathed.  Common sense tells us that Russia and China have to be under-reporting their numbers.

2.) As should be expected due to many developmental factors, there are numerous information holes all over the world.  No one really believes that all of Africa has less than hundred cases of swine flu, but the reporting mechanisms simply are not there. Most African and Eurasian countries, with few exceptions, consistently rank at the bottom of the corruption (and development) rankings, and so it is not suprising that there appears to be a vast information hole in these regions.

3.) As to be expected, since the H1N1 flu is thought to have originated in Mexico, the greatest concentration of cases is in South and North America.  If the “corruption versus swine flu cases reported theory” is to hold any water, then we would expect that many countries in South America would have to rank near the bottom of the list when swine flu case reports are totaled up.  However, in this case, their proximity to Mexico, and the high rate of migration between South and North America justifies their rank near the top.

Important Implications:
1.) Current flu report statistics are very low compared to actual statistics.  If China’s report rate as % of population was anywhere near that of the US, worldwide cases of swine flu would double.

2.) Expat parents in Asia should get ready for a flu heavy fall.  If you are a parent, read this article in the NY Times warning US parents that flu infection is coming early this year, and take its advice to heart.

3.) Those who are already sick, old, and/or frail.  Be careful when traveling to Asia.

4.) Asians love pork.  While it’s true that you can’t get sick from cooked pork, try to stick to the cleanest restaurants if you plan to eat it.  In developing regions spitting is common and washing hands is rare.  So, it’s not the meat that will get you sick, but the cook and/or the butcher who prepared it.

5.) Anybody out there in the flu vaccine business? Be prepared to be out of stock sooner than planned.

7 Comments

  1. David
    Posted July 18, 2009 at 7:15 am | Permalink

    Very interesting post

  2. Posted July 19, 2009 at 5:57 am | Permalink

    @David
    Thank you, very interesting. I appreciated this info. A poteintial client contact me to support him in a projet to get drug (legal one…) from Canada and he can do the distribution in different area in INdia and also in different territorry not ”really” open to pharmaceuticals industry. This maybe potential client will be their distributor, he is a pharmacist. I am still exploring this possible association. If you can give me your feed-back about this, it will be appreciate. Thank you, Best Regards
    Claire Latendresse, MOntreal, Canada,Business coach-Strategic planning, sales&marketing, healht care, communication

    • Posted July 20, 2009 at 6:18 pm | Permalink

      Hey Claire,

      See response in the next post.

      //D

  3. Posted July 20, 2009 at 1:06 pm | Permalink

    Hi Damjan,

    Hope all is well. Interesting article regarding H1N1 in India ( a previous bastion of nontransparency…or at least corruption). You did not mention India but ZERO cases and clean bill of health from WHO really appears shocking to me. Here’s the link…

    http://www.domain-b.com/industry/Healthcare/20090502_india_doing.html

    Tej

    • Posted July 20, 2009 at 6:20 pm | Permalink

      Great article. It provides what for me is a plausible explanation for the under-reporting of numbers – economic incentives.

      I will keep a further eye on this, and post this up as well.

      Thank you, Tej.

  4. Posted July 20, 2009 at 6:09 pm | Permalink

    I think the conclusion drawn based only on the frequencies of reported cases is biased. When drawing this conclusion, the author did not take into consideration other factors that may have affected the frequencies of H1N1 occurance at different countries. As we all know that H1N1 originated from US/Mexico and is an infectious disease and so far it is mostly transmitted from one person to another. If the path of transmission is effectively blocked, a country could very well protect itself from H1N1.

    Take China as an example. Ever since H1N1 breakout, Chinese government has imposed strict control of disease monitoring at all international airport, monitoring all passengers coming from abroad, especially mexico and USA. Not only body temperatures were monitored right after arrival, passengers coming from mexico and US are required to quarantine themselves for one week before coming into frequent contact with other people. In addition, anybody reported to a hospital to have high temperature is checked for H1N1 immediately and quanrantined if results are positive. These actions have greatly hurdled the spread of H1N1 in China. So far, the Chinese government has proactively reported the disease on all major media channels (I have friends in China who watches New everyday). The reporting has been so exhaustive that it makes people think another SARS is coming although very few people were actually sick and died from this disease. The author’s claim that the government is covering the case numbers is not supported with any evidence and is not the right way to establishing one’s argument. Of course somebody would battle me about the quanrantine using the “Human rights issue”. However, if a country can not guard its citizen against deadly diseases, where would human rights lie upon?

  5. Posted July 24, 2009 at 6:12 am | Permalink

    I think this is a cooked up article and bases of the argument is questionable. This is another typical example of imbalanced Asan mind to imitate their former colonial masters’ art of trade.

4 Trackbacks

  1. [...] A few days ago I presented a case for the under reporting of swine flu cases in mainland Asia.  I did not touch on India in that article, but as of July 20th it has only 112 confirmed cases of swine flu.  This would put it well South of any reasonable predictions of swine flu prevalence.    Reader, Tej Dehol, who doubles as editor of the very good Clearstate Health Blog sent in an article from May 2009, titled “India Prepared for Swine Flu Outbreak: WHO”. [...]

  2. [...] Due to corruption, Asia is in for a big swine flu year [...]

  3. [...] healthcare reforms do have their drawbacks (I have covered them here, here, here, and here) but the reforms only started this past year and the improvements (here, here, and [...]

  4. [...] just want to take this opportunity to point out that I told you so way back in June when I said that H1N1 was being underreported in China and that the count would seemingly explode in [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Please leave these two fields as-is:

Subscribe without commenting